Air Jordan 4 “White Cement”: Comparing the 2016 and 2025 Retros
Which iteration reigns supreme? Find out in this deep dive.
The Air Jordan 4 “White Cement” is one of the most iconic colorways in sneaker history, first debuting in 1989 and celebrated for its clean white leather, speckled gray “cement” accents, and classic Nike Air branding. Both the 2016 and 2025 retros pay homage to this legacy, but each brings unique features and improvements that set them apart.


Design and Aesthetic Fidelity of the Air Jordan 4 “White Cement”
The 2016 release of the AJ4 “White Cement” was highly anticipated, as it marked the return of the original Nike Air branding on the heel for the first time since the 1999 retro. This detail was a major selling point for purists and collectors, restoring a key element of the OG look.


The sneaker featured a white leather upper, black waffle eyestays, and the signature cement-speckled gray on the midsole, wings, and heel tab. The tongue displayed a red Jumpman above the word “Flight,” and the outsole incorporated all the colors from the classic palette.
In contrast, the 2025 version is being positioned as the closest retro to the original 1989 release yet. Jordan Brand has reportedly refined the shape, height, and netting, aiming for a more accurate OG silhouette.


The 2025 pair features the same Summit White, Fire Red, Tech Grey, and Black colorway, but with subtle updates to the leather quality, panel shape, and cement speckle application, all intended to evoke the original’s spirit even more faithfully. Early reviews and preview images highlight improvements in the leather-described as stiffer and more premium, reminiscent of the Jordan 1 ’85 series-and a more accurate netting pattern and placement.
Material and Build Quality
The 2016 “White Cement” was praised for its improved leather quality over previous retros, particularly the 2012 version, which was criticized for its stiff, almost “cinder block” feel.



The 2016 leather was softer, and the shade of gray used for the cement accents was lighter and closer to the OG. Still, some collectors felt the shape and proportions were not a perfect match for the 1989 original.
For 2025, Jordan Brand has reportedly taken further steps to enhance the build quality. The leather feels more premium and robust, and the netting is thicker and more closely aligned with the original design.


The cement speckling is also said to be more tactile and visually accurate. These refinements, combined with the return of the Nike Air heel branding and original-style packaging, are meant to satisfy both longtime collectors and new fans seeking authenticity and quality.
Air Jordan 4 “White Cement”: Cultural Impact and Market Reception
Both releases have generated significant buzz. The 2016 pair sold out instantly and remains highly sought after on the resale market, with prices reflecting its desirability and status as a near-OG retro.
The 2025 release, scheduled for 24 May, is expected to be a general release in full family sizing, making it more accessible but no less coveted. The sneaker community is particularly excited about the 2025 version’s effort to recapture the essence of the original, coinciding with the 40th anniversary of the Air Jordan line. Notably, both iterations are available on the SNKRDUNK App.

Air Jordan 4 “White Cement” (2016)
AJ4 “White Cement” 2016 vs. 2025 Summary Table
Feature | Air Jordan 4 “White Cement” (2016) | Air Jordan 4 “White Cement” (2025) |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 13 February 2016 | 24 May 2025 |
Retail Price | US$220 | US$225 |
Colorway | White/Fire Red/Black/Tech Grey | Summit White/Fire Red/Tech Grey/Black |
Heel Branding | Nike Air | Nike Air |
Shape | Pointier toe, less OG-accurate silhouette | Closer to 1989 OG: improved height, shape, and proportions |
Leather Quality | Decent, softer than previous retros | Thicker, stiffer, more premium-closest to OG feel |
Cement Speckling | Lightest gray of recent retros, smooth texture | Slightly darker, more tactile speckling, even on Nike Air branding |
Netting | Standard retro netting, smaller mesh area | Thicker, wider mesh, more OG-like netting and placement |
Liner & Padding | Standard padding, liner not tucked behind tongue | More padded, liner tucked behind tongue (OG detail) |
Hang Tag | Hard plastic keychain style, Jumpman logo | OG-style plastic hang tag, Nike Air branding |
Comfort | Good, but not standout | Improved comfort, more padded interior |
Packaging | Retro-inspired | OG-style packaging |
Key Notes:
- • The 2025 version is widely regarded as the most OG-accurate retro yet, with improvements in shape, leather, netting, and details like the liner and hang tag.
- • The 2016 pair brought back the Nike Air heel branding but is lighter in cement color and less accurate in shape compared to the 2025 release.
- • The 2025 release features more tactile cement speckling, a more padded interior, and an OG-style hang tag.
Conclusion
While the 2016 Air Jordan 4 “White Cement” retro was a milestone for its return to Nike Air branding and improved materials, the 2025 version raises the bar with even greater attention to OG detail.
From the refined shape and premium leather to the more accurate netting and cement speckling, the 2025 release is designed to please both collectors seeking authenticity and new fans eager for a piece of sneaker history. As always, the “White Cement” AJ4 remains a timeless classic new iteration, a celebration of Jordan Brand’s enduring legacy
For the latest releases, breaking news, and exclusive interviews, stay tuned to the SNKRDUNK Magazine and @snkrdunk on Instagram. Explore the SNKRDUNK App and use the welcome code from the banner below before making your first purchase. Additionally, if you want to try a pair out, visit our stores in Singapore and Japan!
Follow us on:
More SNKRDUNK Features:
Jordan Jumpman Jack vs. Zoom Field Jaxx: Comparing Travis Scott Shoes
Air Jordan 5 Retro OG “Black Metallic Reimagined” vs. Air Jordan 1 High ‘85 “Bred” (2025)
PUMA Speedcat vs. adidas Samba vs. Onitsuka Tiger Mexico 66
Exploring the Best “UNC” Jordans (Including the Air Jordan 1 High OG “UNC Reimagined”)
What’s the Difference? Nike Air Force 1 Low vs. Nike Air Force 3 Low
